February 10th, 2022
This week was my first time sitting in on one of Cameron’s class critiques. I had been wanting to see how this was done since I started at Perpich because critiques were such a unique and formative experience of my arts education. I had talked with Cameron previously about how the critique process operates at Perpich, and what that typically entails. I was glad to learn that typically critiques take a gentler approach than higher arts education since students are still so relatively new to the experience. During this critique, students had thought about a guiding question that they wanted their classmates to answer when talking about the work. Then the class would pipe in and answer the question, along with giving other feedback. Cameron and I would pipe in sporadically throughout, but the main focus was on the peer discussion. Some of my favorite questions posed were, “Can you feel the emotional state of the character, and what tells you that?” and “What could I do to improve the flow of the story and make the imagery more interesting?” I thought that the quality of feedback that was given was incredible as well. Students were able to keep the environment lighthearted but helpful and it was evident that by making critiquing a common occurrence, students were very receptive to what their peers had to say and really valued the feedback.